Revision history for IssuePoistionsGuide


Revision [57778]

Last edited on 2021-07-15 10:19:54 by JamesW [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
2. Vote Easy - Our candidate matching tool: https://voteeasy.votesmart.org/
Deletions:
3. Vote Easy - Our candidate matching tool: https://voteeasy.votesmart.org/
2. Their Positions part of Political Galaxy: https://votesmart.org/galaxy


Revision [53748]

Edited on 2018-11-14 13:01:10 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]

No Differences

Revision [53747]

Edited on 2018-11-14 13:00:16 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
3. Vote Easy - Our candidate matching tool: https://voteeasy.votesmart.org/
Deletions:
3. VoteEasy - Our candidate matching tool


Revision [53746]

Edited on 2018-11-14 12:58:09 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
However, only ~25% of Congressional candidates take the PCT (based off of recent years). Voters are still interested in where their candidates stand on the issues, so we go ahead and research how candidates would answer these questions. When candidates fail to take the PCT, these researched determinations act as a substitute on the three tools mentioned above. This research is our answer to candidates failing to provide citizens with their stances on the key issues. We use their public record to divine where they stand on the issue. Therefore, it is especially important that the research is comprehensive and evidence based.
Deletions:
However, only ~25% of Congressional candidates take the PCT (based off of recent years). Voters are still interested in where their candidates stand on the issues, so we go ahead and research how candidates would answer these questions. When candidates fail to take the PCT, these researched determinations act as a substitute on the three tools mentioned above.
In an ideal world, each politician would directly, clearly, and consistently demonstrate his or her adherence to a specific issue position; in reality, we may need to make judgments based on a collection of evidence. This research is our answer to candidates failing to provide citizens with their stances on the key issues. Therefore, it is especially important that the research is comprehensive and evidence based.


Revision [53745]

Edited on 2018-11-14 12:56:51 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
However, only ~25% of Congressional candidates take the PCT (based off of recent years). Voters are still interested in where their candidates stand on the issues, so we go ahead and research how candidates would answer these questions. When candidates fail to take the PCT, these researched determinations act as a substitute on the three tools mentioned above.
Deletions:
However, only ~25% of Congressional candidates take the PCT (based off of recent years). Voters are still interested in where their candidates stand on the issues, so we go ahead and research how candidates would answer these questions. When candidates fail to take the PCT, these researched determinations act as a substitute for the three tools mentioned above.


Revision [53744]

Edited on 2018-11-14 12:56:19 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
2. Their Positions part of Political Galaxy: https://votesmart.org/galaxy
Deletions:
2. Their Positions part of Political Galaxy: https://votesmart.org/galaxy/Jimmy-Gomez-138524/Abortion-2/positions


Revision [53743]

Edited on 2018-11-14 12:55:49 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
1. The candidate's "Positions" page on the website: https://votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/22421
Deletions:
1. The candidate's "Positions" page on the website: https://votesmart.org/candidate/political-courage-test/138524


Revision [53742]

Edited on 2018-11-14 12:54:34 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
**Reason for Issue Position Research**
**End Goal of Issue Position Research:**
To construct strong and defensible determinations of politicians' positions on the questions posed by the Political Courage test.
Deletions:
**End Goal of Issue Position Research:** To construct strong and defensible determinations of politicians' positions on the questions posed by the Political Courage test.


Revision [53741]

Edited on 2018-11-14 12:53:29 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
**End Goal of Issue Position Research:** To construct strong and defensible determinations of politicians' positions on the questions posed by the Political Courage test.
Deletions:
**The end goal of Issue Position Research:** To construct strong and defensible determinations of politicians' positions on the questions posed by the Political Courage test.


Revision [53740]

Edited on 2018-11-14 12:53:15 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
**The end goal of Issue Position Research:** To construct strong and defensible determinations of politicians' positions on the questions posed by the Political Courage test.
Deletions:
**The end goal of Issue Position Research:** To construct strong and defensible determinations of politicians' positions.


Revision [53739]

Edited on 2018-11-14 12:52:29 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
**The end goal of Issue Position Research:** To construct strong and defensible determinations of politicians' positions.
Deletions:
The goal of Issue Position Research is to construct strong and defensible determinations of politicians' positions.


Revision [53738]

Edited on 2018-11-14 12:50:22 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
However, only ~25% of Congressional candidates take the PCT (based off of recent years). Voters are still interested in where their candidates stand on the issues, so we go ahead and research how candidates would answer these questions. When candidates fail to take the PCT, these researched determinations act as a substitute for the three tools mentioned above.
Deletions:
However, only ~25% of Congressional candidates take the PCT (based off of recent years). Voters are still interested in where their candidates stand on the issues, so we go ahead and research how candidates would answer these questions. When candidates fail to take the PCT, these researched determinations (referred to as VoteEasy Determinations or Issue Position Determinations) act as a substitute for the three tools mentioned above.


Revision [53737]

Edited on 2018-11-14 12:49:47 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
**====Introduction to Issue Position Research====**
Deletions:
**====Reason For Issue Position Research====**


Revision [53735]

Edited on 2018-11-14 12:48:58 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
2. Their Positions part of Political Galaxy: https://votesmart.org/galaxy/Jimmy-Gomez-138524/Abortion-2/positions
3. VoteEasy - Our candidate matching tool
Deletions:
2. Their Positions part of Political Galaxy: https://votesmart.org/galaxy/#/Jimmy-Gomez-138524/Abortion-2/positions
3. VoteEasy - Our candidate matching tool that is active during election season


Revision [53734]

Edited on 2018-11-14 12:48:24 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Additions:
The goal of Issue Position Research is to construct strong and defensible determinations of politicians' positions.
In an ideal world, each politician would directly, clearly, and consistently demonstrate his or her adherence to a specific issue position; in reality, we may need to make judgments based on a collection of evidence. This research is our answer to candidates failing to provide citizens with their stances on the key issues. Therefore, it is especially important that the research is comprehensive and evidence based.
Deletions:
The goal of VoteEasy Research is to construct strong and defensible determinations of politicians' positions.
In an ideal world, each politician would directly, clearly, and consistently demonstrate his or her adherence to a specific issue position; in reality, we may need to make judgments based on a collection of evidence.
Issue Position Research is incredibly important, as it feeds into multiple applications (VoteEasy, Political Galaxy, & Positions folder on the live site). This research is our answer to candidates failing to provide citizens with their stances on the key issues. Therefore, it is especially important that this research is comprehensive and evidence based.


Revision [53733]

The oldest known version of this page was created on 2018-11-14 12:46:55 by Peter [removal of onpoint and galaxy mentions]
Valid XHTML :: Valid CSS: :: Powered by WikkaWiki