Legislative Process Guide
Before writing legislation, a legislator must identify five things:
- The underlying purpose(s) of the legislation and the principle statute(s) that the legislator must supplement, delete, or amend in order to achieve that purpose;
- How the statute will appear once it becomes law;
- Secondary statutes that affect the principle statute being addressed by the legislation, if applicable;
- How these secondary statutes must be amended to accommodate the new statute or amendments to the principle existing statute, if applicable; and
- The effective date of the legislation.
Findings or Intent
Some legislatures will also include a section detailing the findings or the intent of the legislature, but this doesn't carry any legal weight, and we don't cover this due to its partisan nature.
The Purpose of the Bill
After determining the purpose of the legislation, a legislator must locate the principle statute that needs to be amended, unless they are adding a new statute to achieve this goal. If the legislator intends to add a section to the law they will introduce it as such. For example, Section 1 of HB 503 from Idaho during the 2008 session intends to supplement material to the state code, and is introduced in this manner:
- SECTION 1. That Chapter 43, Title 33, Idaho Code, be, and the same is hereby amended by the addition hereto of a NEW SECTION, to be known and designated as Section 334316, Idaho Code, and to read as follows:
Repeals Existing Statute
If an existing statute does exist, then a legislator can either repeal the existing statute outright or issue amendments to the statute. If a legislator repeals a statute, the section of the statute will be listed, followed by a brief explanation that the statute will be repealed. For example, the entire text (not including the effective date) of S 8638 in New York during the 2008 session reads:
- Section 1. Subparagraph (vi) of paragraph 8 of subdivision (b) of section 1101 of the tax law is REPEALED.
Amends Existing Law
If a legislator intends to amend a statute, the legislation will identify the statute's section number and note that it will be amended as follows. For example, Section 1 of LB 1 in Nebraska during a special session in 2008 amends the law in this manner, and is introduced as follows:
- Section 1. Section 29-121, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, is amended to read:
When you're reading a bill text, it's best to check the introductions of each section to see how existing law will be amended.
Identifying New Laws and Laws Being Deleted
The text of the legislation will indicate what is existing law and what is new law. States differ in how they identify new law contained within the legislation, but it's typically rather conspicuous. CAPITAL LETTERS and underlining usually indicate new law, and striking text and using [brackets] indicate existing law that will be deleted. For example, LB 1 from Nebraska is a bill that is targeting the "safe haven law," which received significant media attention. In an attempt to establish an age-limit for this law, which protects adults who abandon children at hospitals from prosecution, the statute was amended by the final version of the bill as follows:
- Section 1. Section 29-121, Reissue Revised Statutes of Nebraska, is amended to read:
- 29-121 No person shall be prosecuted for any crime based solely upon the act of leaving a child thirty days old or younger in the custody of an employee on duty at a hospital licensed by the State of Nebraska. The hospital shall promptly contact appropriate authorities to take custody of the child.
The bill does not require existing law be deleted, since there was not an age-limit to begin with. Instead, the bill inserts the phrase "thirty days old or younger" in the appropriate place to establish an age limit.
Let's review an example of existing law being deleted. HB 2769 from Arizona during the 2008 session sought to amend the law covering late-term abortion. The bill increased the penalty for performing such an abortion and revises the definition of "partial-birth abortion." With respect to increasing the penalty, the bill text reads:
- Section 1. Section 13-3603.01, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
- 13-3603.01. Partial-birth abortions; classification; civil action; definitions
- A. A person ANY PHYSICIAN who knowingly performs a partial-birth abortion and who THEREBY kills a human fetus is guilty of a Class 6 5 felony....
A strike-through indicates matter deleted from the law, whereas text that is in CAPITAL LETTERS indicates new law. The principle change that we're concerned with is elevating the classification of the crime from a Class 6 felony to a Class 5 felony, which carries with it an increase in penalties for physicians who perform this procedure. The bill also includes the following change in the definition of "partial birth abortion":
- .... E. For the purposes of this section:
- 1. "Partial-birth abortion" means an abortion in which the person performing the abortion partially vaginally delivers a living fetus before killing the fetus and completing the delivery DOES BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING:
- (a) DELIBERATELY AND INTENTIONALLY VAGINALLY DELIVERS A LIVING FETUS UNTIL, IN THE CASE OF A HEADFIRST PRESENTATION, THE ENTIRE FETAL HEAD IS OUTSIDE THE BODY OF THE MOTHER OR, IN THE CASE OF BREECH PRESENTATION, ANY PART OF THE FETAL TRUNK PAST THE NAVAL IS OUTSIDE THE BODY OF THE MOTHER FOR THE PURPOSE OF PERFORMING AN OVERT ACT THAT THE PERSON KNOWS WILL KILL THE PARTIALLY DELIVERED LIVING FETUS.
- (b) PERFORMS THE OVERT ACT, OTHER THAN COMPLETION OF DELIVERY, THAT KILLS THE PARTIALLY DELIVERED LIVING FETUS....
Existing law relied upon a very limited definition of "partial-birth abortion." The intent of this legislation, in addition to increasing penalties for performing one, is to erase the old definition and provide one that is consistent with the federal definition.
Identifying Amendments
S 249-A from New York during the 2009 session is revising eligibility requirements for the Shock Incarceration Program, which allows specific inmates to serve 6 months in a shock incarceration facility in exchange for conditional early release. However, the principle statute here is not the one that outlines the specifics of the program, but rather the definition of "eligible inmate." Keep in mind that this bill uses [brackets] to indicate existing law that will be deleted:
- 1. "Eligible inmate" means a person sentenced to an indeterminate term of imprisonment who will become eligible for release on parole within three years or sentenced to a determinate term of imprisonment who will become eligible for conditional release within three years, who has not reached the age of [forty] FIFTY years, who has not previously been convicted of a felony upon which an indeterminate or determinate term of imprisonment was imposed and who was between the ages of sixteen and [forty] FIFTY years at the time of commission of the crime upon which his or her present sentence was based except, however, an eligible inmate shall not include a person sentenced [to a determinate sentence of three and one-half years or more] as a second felony drug offender pursuant to subdivision [three] FOUR of section 70.70 of the penal law for a conviction of a class B felony offense defined in article two hundred twenty of the penal law...
As you can see, the age of an eligible inmate has been increased from 40 to 50 years. In addition, the bill also relaxes restrictions on drug offenders entering the program. Existing law prohibited anyone who was sentenced to 3.5 years or more under subsection 3 of section 70.70 of the penal code, which covers all felony drug offenses. The bill amends this section to prohibit only those sentenced under subsection 4 of section 70.70 of the Penal Code, which covers inmates convicted of a second felony drug offense that were previously convicted of a violent felony.
References to Existing Law
Occasionally existing law is not provided in the bill, so you must find the existing statute using the citation number provided in the bill text. Here is an example: S 8638 from New York during the 2008 session. The only two sections of the bill read:
- Section 1. Subparagraph (vi) of paragraph 8 of subdivision (b) of section 1101 of the tax law is REPEALED.
- ยง 2. This act shall take effect immediately.
The text of the existing law is not provided to tell us what "Subparagraph (vi) of paragraph 8 of subdivision (b) of section 1101 of the tax law" is. You will have to locate that section of the code on their website, where you'll find that this subsection of the law reads:
- .... (vi) For purposes of subclause (I) of clause (C) of subparagraph (i) of this paragraph, a person making sales of tangible personal property or services taxable under this article ("seller") shall be presumed to be soliciting business through an independent contractor or other representative if the seller enters into an agreement with a resident of this state under which the resident, for a commission or other consideration, directly or indirectly refers potential customers, whether by a link on an Internet website or otherwise, to the seller, if the cumulative gross receipts from sales by the seller to customers in the state who are referred to the seller by all residents with this type of an agreement with the seller is in excess of ten thousand dollars during the preceding four quarterly periods ending on the last day of February, May, August, and November. This presumption may be rebutted by proof that the resident with whom the seller has an agreement did not engage in any solicitation in the state on behalf of the seller that would satisfy the nexus requirement of the United States constitution during the four quarterly periods in question. Nothing in this subparagraph shall be construed to narrow the scope of the terms independent contractor or other representative for purposes of subclause (I) of clause (C) of subparagraph (i) of this paragraph.
This language may seem convoluted, especially without the context of the complete statute. If you were to look at the full statute, you'd notice that this lists transactions that are subject to the sales tax, and this particular subsection of the bill extends the sales tax to out-of-state merchants that sell items purchased by and shipped to New York residents. The intent of the legislation is to repeal such a tax.
Secondary Purpose of the Bill
"Secondary statutes" may also be addressed by legislation. This refers to sections of the code that are affected by the principle statute being addressed by the legislation. If legislation intends to amend, delete, or supplement laws, there's a good chance that another provision of the code references that statute. Therefore, that provision will further amending so that the two are consistent. For example, AB 2220 from Arizona during the 2008 session was a proposal to repeal the State Equalization Property Tax. Section 1 of the bill reads:
- Section 1. Repeal
- Section 15-994, Arizona Revised Statutes, is repealed.
Other Provisions not to Overlook
In the above example the repealed statute enforces the tax. Because the repeal of this tax is the sole purpose of this bill, you might assume that all the bill needs is an effective date for completion. However, this is a 19 page bill. Several other statutes on the books govern things related to this tax and must now be amended. For example, the bill makes an amendatory change to Section 15-971 as follows:
- Sec. 3. Section 15-971, Arizona Revised Statutes, is amended to read:
- 15-971. Determination of equalization assistance payments for school districts
- A. Equalization assistance for education is computed by determining the total of the following:
- B. From the total of the amounts determined in subsection A of this section subtract:
- C. County aid for equalization assistance for education shall be computed as follows:
- D. State aid for equalization assistance for education for a school district shall be computed as follows:
- E. C. Equalization assistance for education shall be paid from appropriations for that purpose to the school districts as provided in section 15-973.
- F. D. A school district shall report expenditures on approved career and technical education and vocational education programs in the annual financial report according to uniform guidelines prescribed by the uniform system of financial records and in order to facilitate compliance with sections 15-255 and 15-904.
- G. E. The additional weight for state aid purposes given to special education as provided in section 15-943 shall be given to school districts only if special education programs comply with the provisions of chapter 7, article 4 of this title and the conditions and standards prescribed by the superintendent of public instruction pursuant to rules of the state board of education for pupil identification and placement pursuant to sections 15-766 and 15-767.
- H. F. In addition to general fund appropriations, all amounts received pursuant to section 37-521, subsection B, paragraph 3 and section 42-5029, subsection E, paragraph 5 and from any other source for the purposes of this section are appropriated for state aid to schools as provided in this section.
- I. G. The total amount of state monies that may be spent in any fiscal year for state equalization assistance shall not exceed the amount appropriated or authorized by section 35-173 for that purpose. This section shall not be construed to impose a duty on an officer, agent or employee of this state to discharge a responsibility or to create any right in a person or group if the discharge or right would require an expenditure of state monies in excess of the expenditure authorized by legislative appropriation for that specific purpose.
If you glance at the text that is being deleted, you'll find that it was a statute defining how the county aid for equalization assistance for education is to be calculated. If the legislature repeals the tax, then the legislature must repeal the section of the law specifying how the revenue is to be distributed. This is a good example of how you'll frequently encounter bills in which the information that we need is in only one section, while the remaining provisions of the bill are simply amendatory changes. You will also encounter legislation where multiple sections require summarization, particularly bills that have multiple purposes. Just remember that bill texts vary greatly in length and clarity, but our primary concern is identifying the underlying purpose of the legislation and the principle statute(s) that fulfill the underlying purpose.
Key Votes Homepage | Training Guide | Summary Writing Guide | Vote Entering Guide | Congress Guide | Status Update Guide | Web Check Guide